GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder73/10082/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Claude Haiku 5.569/10025/10073/10082/10050/10050/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
191K
33K
Completed sessions
1,552,409
348,306
Token share
0.25%
0.03%
Tokens
2.5T+100%
261B+100%
AUG 20OCT 14
AUG 20OCT 14
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.1%8.5K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.