GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.5

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Kimi K2.5MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10059/10082/10033/10092/100
Kimi K2.550/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark20/10042/10064/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.45/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.80/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.1M
16K
Completed sessions
39,817,259
14,454
Token share
21.9%
0%
Tokens
215T+100%
7.8B-84%
AUG 20OCT 14
AUG 20OCT 14
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
77.1%214 user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.