Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 64/100 | 64/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 67/100 | 81/100 | 61/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 64/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$0.90/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
40K
433K
Completed sessions
803,789
2,122,516
Token share
0.02%
0.38%
Tokens
246B+100%
3.7T-13%
AUG 20OCT 14
AUG 20OCT 14
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
58.3%40K user-weeks